Assessments — MPMS

Assessment Count by Directorate

Bar Chart

Status Distribution

Pie Chart

Employee Name ⇵	Designation ⇵	Org Unit ⇵	Period ⇵	Self-Rating ⇵	Sup. Rating ⇵	Final Score ⇵	Status ⇵	Last Modified ⇵
Sipho Mthembu	Director: Engineering	Engineering Services	Q1 2025/2026	3.8	3.5	72%	Supervisor Reviewed	2025-10-28
Nomsa Dlamini	Manager: Water & Sanitation	Engineering Services	Q1 2025/2026	4.2	--	--	Self-Reviewed	2025-10-25
Thabo Mokoena	CFO	Financial Services	Q1 2025/2026	3.6	3.4	68%	Moderated	2025-11-15
Lindiwe Nkosi	Senior Clerk: Finance	Financial Services	Q1 2025/2026	--	--	--	Draft	2025-10-12
Mandla Zungu	Director: Community Services	Community Services	Q1 2025/2026	4.5	4.3	86%	Supervisor Reviewed	2025-10-30
Fatima Patel	Process Controller: Water Treatment	Engineering Services	Q1 2025/2026	3.0	2.8	58%	Supervisor Reviewed	2025-10-27
Bongani Khumalo	Manager: Corporate Support	Corporate Services	Q1 2025/2026	3.9	3.7	74%	Moderated	2025-11-18

Showing 1-7 of 142 assessments

Non-System User Tools

For general workers without computer access -- manage paper-based assessments

Employee Sipho Mthembu

Designation Director: Engineering

Directorate Engineering Services

Supervisor Dr. Thandiwe Mbeki (Municipal Manager)

Financial Year 2025/2026

Assessment Period Q1 (Jul-Sep 2025)

Draft

Created: 2025-10-01

Self-Reviewed

Submitted: 2025-10-18

3

Supervisor Reviewed

Submitted: 2025-10-28

4

Moderated

--

Key Performance Areas -- KPA (80% Weight)

▶ KPA 1: Basic Service Delivery Weight: 25%

KPI Description	Target	Actual	Self-Rating (1-5)	Self-Commentary	POE
% of households with access to basic water supply	95%		1 2 3 4 5	Achieved 92% against 95% target. Delays in Ward 7 infrastructure project impacted final quarter delivery.
% reduction in water losses	10%		1 2 3 4 5	Infrastructure aging in older networks. Replacement programme on track for H2.

Note (s56/57): Actuals entered here are simultaneously written to the SDBIP. Changes will reflect in the Service Delivery KPI table.

▶ KPA 2: Infrastructure Development Weight: 20%

KPI Description	Target	Actual	Self-Rating (1-5)	Self-Commentary	POE
% completion of capital works programme	25% (Q1)		1 2 3 4 5	Procurement delays on bulk water pipeline. Remedial procurement in progress.
Number of new household connections (water)	500		1 2 3 4 5	Strong performance. 480 of 500 target achieved in Q1. On track for annual.

Note (s56/57): Actuals entered here are simultaneously written to the SDBIP. Changes will reflect in the Service Delivery KPI table.

▶ KPA 3: Financial Viability & Management Weight: 15%

KPI Description	Target	Actual	Self-Rating (1-5)	Self-Commentary	POE
% OpEx budget spent within approved allocation	≤100%		1 2 3 4 5	Within budget. 3% underspend due to delayed procurement of fleet vehicles.

▶ KPA 4: Good Governance & Public Participation Weight: 10%

KPI Description	Target	Actual	Self-Rating (1-5)	Self-Commentary	POE
Number of community engagement sessions held	4		1 2 3 4 5	All 4 sessions held. Exceeded attendance targets in 3 of 4 wards.

▶ KPA 5: Local Economic Development Weight: 10%

KPI Description	Target	Actual	Self-Rating (1-5)	Self-Commentary	POE
% of procurement spend on local SMME contractors	30%		1 2 3 4 5	Exceeded target. Dedicated SMME development programme contributing to higher uptake.

Core Management Competencies -- CMC (20% Weight)

Competency	Definition	Weight	Self-Rating (1-5)	Self-Commentary
Strategic Capability & Leadership	Ability to provide a vision, set direction, and inspire others to deliver	5%	1 2 3 4 5	Led departmental strategic review. All section managers aligned on annual targets.
Financial Management	Ability to compile and manage budgets, control cash flow, and optimise expenditure	5%	1 2 3 4 5	Budget management effective. Minor underspend on MIG projects due to procurement timing.
People Management & Empowerment	Ability to manage and encourage people, optimise their output, and develop skills	5%	1 2 3 4 5	Implemented mentorship programme for artisans. 100% of PMS reviews completed on time.
Programme & Project Management	Ability to plan, manage, monitor, and evaluate specific activities to deliver desired outputs	5%	1 2 3 4 5	MIG projects 85% on schedule. Two projects delayed due to environmental impact assessment.

Score Summary (Self-Assessment)

Weighted KPA Score (80%) 2.72 / 4.00

Weighted Competency Score (20%) 0.70 / 1.00

Total Score 3.42 / 5.00

Final Percentage 68.4%

68.4%

Key Performance Areas -- KPA (80% Weight)

▶ KPA 1: Basic Service Delivery Weight: 25%

KPI Description	Target	Actual	Self-Rating	Self-Commentary	Supervisor Rating (1-5)	Supervisor Commentary	POE
% of households with access to basic water supply	95%	92%	1 2 3 4 5	Achieved 92% against 95% target. Delays in Ward 7 infrastructure project impacted final quarter delivery.	1 2 3 4 5	Concur with self-assessment. Ward 7 delays were beyond the Director's control. Mitigation plan was adequate.
% reduction in water losses	10%	8%	1 2 3 4 5	Infrastructure aging in older networks. Replacement programme on track for H2.	1 2 3 4 5	Agree. 8% vs 10% target is reasonable given infrastructure age. H2 replacement programme noted.

▶ KPA 2: Infrastructure Development Weight: 20%

KPI Description	Target	Actual	Self-Rating	Self-Commentary	Supervisor Rating (1-5)	Supervisor Commentary	POE
% completion of capital works programme	25% (Q1)	22%	1 2 3 4 5	Procurement delays on bulk water pipeline. Remedial procurement in progress.	1 2 3 4 5	Procurement delays could have been mitigated with earlier initiation. Rating adjusted downward.

▶ KPA 3: Financial Viability & Management Weight: 15%

KPI Description	Target	Actual	Self-Rating	Self-Commentary	Supervisor Rating (1-5)	Supervisor Commentary	POE
% OpEx budget spent within approved allocation	≤100%	97%	1 2 3 4 5	Within budget. 3% underspend due to delayed procurement of fleet vehicles.	1 2 3 4 5

▶ KPA 4: Good Governance & Public Participation Weight: 10%

KPI Description	Target	Actual	Self-Rating	Self-Commentary	Supervisor Rating (1-5)	Supervisor Commentary	POE
Number of community engagement sessions held	4	4	1 2 3 4 5	All 4 sessions held. Exceeded attendance targets in 3 of 4 wards.	1 2 3 4 5

▶ KPA 5: Local Economic Development Weight: 10%

KPI Description	Target	Actual	Self-Rating	Self-Commentary	Supervisor Rating (1-5)	Supervisor Commentary	POE
% of procurement spend on local SMME contractors	30%	35%	1 2 3 4 5	Exceeded target. Dedicated SMME development programme contributing to higher uptake.	1 2 3 4 5

Core Management Competencies -- CMC (20% Weight)

Competency	Weight	Self-Rating	Self-Commentary	Supervisor Rating (1-5)	Supervisor Commentary
Strategic Capability & Leadership	5%	1 2 3 4 5	Led departmental strategic review.	1 2 3 4 5	Strong leadership demonstrated during water crisis response. Strategic review was comprehensive.
Financial Management	5%	1 2 3 4 5	Budget management effective.	1 2 3 4 5	Adequate. MIG project underspend needs attention in Q2.
People Management & Empowerment	5%	1 2 3 4 5	Implemented mentorship programme.	1 2 3 4 5	Mentorship programme is a commendable initiative. 100% PMS completion rate is excellent.
Programme & Project Management	5%	1 2 3 4 5	MIG projects 85% on schedule.	1 2 3 4 5	EIA delays need proactive management. Recommend earlier engagement with DFFE.

Score Summary (Supervisor Assessment)

Weighted KPA Score (80%) 2.56 / 4.00

Weighted Competency Score (20%) 0.70 / 1.00

Total Score 3.26 / 5.00

Final Percentage 65.2%

65.2%

▶ Rating Scale Reference (1-5)

Rating	Label	Definition
5	Outstanding Performance	Far exceeds standard against all criteria; maintained throughout the year in all areas of responsibility
4	Significantly Above Expectations	Above fully effective against more than half of criteria; fully achieved all others
3	Fully Effective	Fully meets standards in all areas against all significant criteria
2	Not Fully Effective	Below standard in key areas; below fully effective against more than half of key criteria
1	Unacceptable Performance	Below effective against almost all criteria; failed to improve despite management support

KPA Scores

KPA	Weight	Self-Rating (1-5)	Supervisor Rating (1-5)	Comments
Job Knowledge & Output	20%
Safety & Compliance	20%
Equipment Maintenance	20%
Reporting & Record Keeping	10%
Service Delivery	10%

Competency Scores

Competency	Weight	Self-Rating (1-5)	Supervisor Rating (1-5)
Teamwork & Communication	7%
Interpersonal Skills	7%
Initiative & Flexibility	6%